Paul S

From Wiki Gonzalez

Shocked that he gets an entry, as most of his posts are: (A) backed by some evidence, yet poorly argued; (B) one line throwaways in Game Chatter; or (C) vague questions which may prove intriguing, but call upon others to do the legwork (i.e., "I don't think Ted Lilly's second half in 2003 can be called a fluke because I seem to recall that he dropped an ineffective pitch/changed arm slots/made some other mechanical adjustment. Does anyone else recall this?").

It is estimated that a full 2/3rds of posts are along the lines of "Ortizzle!"

Underemployed Canadian Red Sox fan born 2/23/79.

Frequently drunk when posting.